A call to arms to reduce premature deaths by using inexpensive resuscitation care

cc6970 CCJ Commentary A call to arms to reduce premature deaths by using inexpensive resuscitation care Warren A Sam sawarren@u.washington.edu Nichol Graham

Harborview Medical Center and University of Washington-Harborview Center for Prehospital Emergency Care, University of Washington, 325 Ninth Ave, Seattle, WA 98104, USA

Critical Care 1364-8535 2008 12 4 173 http://ccforum.com/content/12/4/173 See related research by Graf et al., http://ccforum.com/content/12/4/R92 1877158710.1186/cc6970 19 8 2008 2008 BioMed Central Ltd

Abstract

Two hundred seventy thousand people in the US and 450,000 people in Europe experience out-of-hospital cardiac arrest each year. Perceived poor prognosis and expense of care of patients resuscitated from cardiac arrest remain barriers to implementation of effective therapies. In this issue of Critical Care, Graf and colleagues have provided a programmatic evaluation of the costs and consequences of intensive care after resuscitation from cardiac arrest. Thirty-one percent of the cohort that survived to be cared for in the intensive care setting were still alive 5 years after hospital discharge. The health-related quality of life of this group of 5-year survivors was similar to that of matched healthy controls, and the cost per quality-adjusted life year gained was similar to or less than the cost of other commonly used medical interventions. We need to change the culture of resuscitation and recognize that cardiac arrest is a treatable condition that is associated with acceptable quality of life and costs of care after resuscitation.

In this issue of Critical Care, Graf and colleagues 1 describe a long-term cohort study of the costs and consequences of intensive care after resuscitation from cardiac arrest. We took particular interest in this study because health care costs in the US exceed those of any other nation. This study was a programmatic evaluation rather than an assessment of a specific intervention such as therapeutic hypothermia. Thirty-one percent of the cohort that survived to be cared for in the intensive care setting were still alive 5 years after hospital discharge. The health-related quality of life of this group of 5-year survivors was similar to that of matched healthy controls. The cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained was 14,487 euros (approximately US $22,900 at current rates). The cost per life year gained increased by 18% when it included the 6.4% of 5-year survivors who had severe neurological disability (that is, Glasgow Coma Scale score of less than 6).

How much to pay for a health intervention is a poignant question most societies have yet to answer formally. Such decisions are complex and are predicated not only on the absolute and incremental cost of the intervention but also on the quantity and quality of effectiveness data related to the intervention. Countries with a centralized planning process for health care may imply their answer when they approve or disapprove for national formulary a drug designed to extend life in a terminal disease. The UK's National Health Service recently declined approval of bevacizumab (Avastin, with a cost of therapy per year of approximately $100,000) as first-line therapy for lung and breast cancer 2. In the US, there appears to be a general consensus that $50,000 to $100,000 per year of life gained is acceptable 3. An analysis based on economic principles suggested that we should be willing to spend up to twice the average annual income on health care 4. In this light, less than 15,000 euros per QALY for intensive care after resuscitation from cardiac arrest is similar to or less than the cost of other commonly used medical interventions.

This study has some limitations relative to current standards for economic evaluation of health interventions 5. It was performed in a single institution in a single country. The application of post hoc subgroup analysis based on neurologic status tended to underestimate the costs and overestimate the cost-effectiveness of the program. Restricting the analysis to consider a health care rather than a societal perspective underestimated costs and made it difficult to compare the results of this analysis with comprehensive economic evaluations of health care and other interventions. However, such limitations are unlikely to change the central messages of the study. These are that quality of life after resuscitation from cardiac arrest is good and that the costs of care after resuscitation are acceptable.

The study of Graf and colleagues is a timely one. Survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) has been static over time 6, but a recent analysis suggests that outcomes are improving 7. Therapeutic hypothermia 89 is likely to be the first of several effective hospital-based interventions for cardiac arrest 101112. However, adoption of hypothermia has been slow 13. The perceived poor prognosis and expense of care of patients resuscitated from cardiac arrest are key barriers to the implementation of effective therapies such as cooling. We need to change the culture of resuscitation and recognize that cardiac arrest is a treatable condition that is associated with good quality of life after resuscitation as well as acceptable costs of care.

In many countries, a high percentage of health care costs occur in the last year of life. Imminent death is not always predictable, and a persistent vegetative state is associated with poor quality of life. Therefore, we require better methods of predicting who will recover and who will have disability after resuscitation from cardiac arrest 14, especially in the era of hypothermia.

Two hundred seventy thousand people experience OHCA each year in the US (G. Nichol, unpublished data). About 450,000 do so in Europe based on extrapolation from population-based incidence estimates 15. Only 7% of those with OHCA survive to discharge 16. If we double survival after OHCA, then 18,900 premature deaths in the US and 31,500 in Europe would be averted each year. There are many ways to improve the chain of survival, including improved communications from citizens to emergency medical services, delivery of care to the patient, delivery of the patient to the hospital, and delivery of cardiac and critical care once there. The time has come for us to come together to do so.

Abbreviations

OHCA = out-of-hospital cardiac arrest; QALY = quality-adjusted life year.

Competing interests

SAW is a member of the American Heart Association (AHA) (Dallas, TX, USA) National Registry for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Adult Research Task Force. GN is a member of the AHA Advanced Cardiac Life Support Subcommittee, the Scientific Advisory Board of the AHA National Registry for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation, and the Board of Directors of the Medic One Foundation (Seattle, WA, USA). He has received grants from the National Institutes of Health (Bethesda, MD, USA) for the Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium (2004–2009), the Laerdal Foundation for Acute Medicine (Stavanger, Norway) for a randomized trial of a CPR training aid (2007), and the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (Ottawa, ON, Canada) and Medtronic Inc. (Minneapolis, MN, USA) for a randomized trial of a resynchronization therapy (2005–2009). He has received equipment, including mannequins (Laerdal Medical, Stavanger, Norway) and monitor/defibrillators (Physio-Control Inc., a division of Medtronic, Redmond, WA, USA), donated to support overseas medical missions. Travel expenses were provided to him by INNERCOOL therapies Inc. (San Diego, CA, USA) and Radiant Medical Inc. (Redwood City, CA, USA) for single trips in 2006. He consulted for Northfield Laboratories Inc. (Evanston, IL, USA) and Paracor Medical Inc. (Sunnyvale, CA, USA) in 2007.

Health care costs, long-term survival, and quality of life following intensive care unit admission after cardiac arrest Graf J Mühlhoff C Doig GS Reinartz S Bode K Dujardin R Koch KC Roeb E Janssens U Crit Care 2008 12 R92 10.1186/cc6963 18638367 NICE rejects cancer drug in clash with Roche Hirschler B Reid K Thompson A http://uk.reuters.com/article/allBreakingNews/idUKL2645842120080626 When is critical care medicine cost-effective? A systematic review of the cost-effectiveness literature Talmor D Shapiro N Greenberg D Stone PW Neumann PJ Crit Care Med 2006 34 2738 2747 10.1097/01.CCM.0000241159.18620.AB 16957636 Economic foundations of cost-effectiveness analysis Garber AM Phelps CE J Health Economics 1997 16 1 31 10.1016/S0167-6296(96)00506-1 10167301 Gold MR Siegel JE Russell LB Weinstein MC Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine New York: Oxford University Press 1996 Increasing use of cardiopulmonary resuscitation during out-of-hospital ventricular fibrillation arrest: survival implications of guideline changes Rea TD Helbock M Perry S Garcia M Cloyd D Becker L Eisenberg M Circulation 2006 114 2760 2765 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.654715 17159062 Improved survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest is associated with an increase in proportion of emergency crew-witnessed cases and bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation Hollenberg J Herlitz J Lindqvist J Riva G Bohm K Rosenqvist M Svensson L Circulation 2008 118 389 396 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.734137 18606920 Mild therapeutic hypothermia to improve the neurologic outcome after cardiac arrest The Hypothermia after Cardiac Arrest Study Group N Engl J Med 2002 346 549 556 [erratum in: N Engl J Med 2002, 346:1756]. 10.1056/NEJMoa012689 11856793 Treatment of comatose survivors of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest with induced hypothermia Bernard SA Gray TW Buist MD Jones BM Silvester W Gutteridge G Smith K N Engl J Med 2002 346 557 563 10.1056/NEJMoa003289 11856794 High-volume hemofiltration after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a randomized study Laurent I Adrie C Vinsonneau C Cariou A Chiche JD Ohanessian A Spaulding C Carli P Dhainaut JF Monchi M J Am Coll Cardiol 2005 46 432 437 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.04.039 16053954 Implementation of a standardised treatment protocol for post resuscitation care after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest Sunde K Pytte M Jacobsen D Mangschau A Jensen LP Smedsrud C Draegni T Steen PA Resuscitation 2007 73 29 39 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2006.08.016 17258378 Early direct coronary angioplasty in survivors of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest Keelan PC Bunch TJ White RD Packer DL Holmes DR Jr Am J Cardiol 2003 91 1461 1463 A6. 10.1016/S0002-9149(03)00398-9 12804734 Therapeutic hypothermia utilization among physicians after resuscitation from cardiac arrest Merchant RM Soar J Skrifvars MB Silfvast T Edelson DP Ahmad F Huang KN Khan M Hoek Vanden TL Becker LB Abella BS Crit Care Med 2006 34 1935 1940 10.1097/01.CCM.0000220494.90290.92 16691134 Outcome after cardiac arrest: predictive values and limitations of the neuroproteins neuron-specific enolase and protein S-100 and the Glasgow Coma Scale Pfeifer R Borner A Krack A Siqusch HH Surber R Fiqulla HR Resuscitation 2005 65 49 55 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2004.10.011 15797275 Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in the 1990's: a population-based study in the Maastricht area on incidence, characteristics and survival de Vreede-Swagemakers JJ Gorgels AP Dubois-Arbouw WI van Ree JW Daemen MJ Houben LG Wellens HJ J Am Coll Cardiol 1997 30 1500 1505 10.1016/S0735-1097(97)00355-0 9362408 A cumulative meta-analysis of the effectiveness of defibrillator-capable emergency medical services for victims of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest Nichol G Stiell IG Laupacis A Pham B De Maio V Wells GA Ann Emerg Med 1999 34 517 525 10.1016/S0196-0644(99)80054-7 10499952