Critical Care

official impact factor 4.60

Commentary

Variation in sepsis care: a wake-up call

Mary E Hartman1* and Derek C Angus2

Author Affiliations

1 Research Fellow, CRISMA (Clinical Research, Investigation and Systems Modeling of Acute Illness) Laboratory, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA

2 Vice Chair for Research, Department of Critical Care Medicine, and Director, CRISMA (Clinical Research, Investigation and Systems Modeling of Acute Illness) Laboratory, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA

For all author emails, please log on.

Critical Care 2003, 7:211-213 doi:10.1186/cc2191

Published: 1 May 2003

Abstract

There is important variation in the care of critically ill patients. While some of this variability is appropriate, and represents individually titrated care, residual variation indicates over- and under-use of precious resources and is clearly concerning. Recent advances in critical care medicine provide "road maps" to standardize care and use evidence-based medicine to improve patient outcomes. Knowledge about which therapies to use, and under what circumstances to use them, could form a basis for measuring the consistency and quality of our care processes. These simple process measures can be easily incorporated into daily rounds and serve to inform on the quality of our care.

Keywords:
critical care; evidence-based medicine; outcome; process assessment; variation