Critical Care

official impact factor 4.60

Commentary

Critical care transfers – a danger foreseen is half avoided

Philip Haji-Michael

Author Affiliations

Consultant in Critical Care Medicine and Anaesthesia, Christie Hospital, Manchester, UK

Critical Care 2005, 9:343-344 doi:10.1186/cc3773


See related research article http://ccforum.com/content/9/4/R446

Published: 12 July 2005

Abstract

How good is the care patients receive during interhospital transfer? The results of a study in this journal make for some disturbing reading. Adverse events occur in about one-third of cases. Half the time this can be related to not following advice from the receiving centre. Of these events, 70% are, in the author's opinion, avoidable and 30% are related to technical problems. So how do we make things better? All transfer equipment needs to be standardized and be "fit-for-purpose". Each hospital needs to take responsibility for the quality of care received in transfer, and this should include guidelines, training and equipment.