<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/rss.css" type="text/css"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
    xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:extra="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"
    xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
    <channel rdf:about="http://ccforum.com/feeds/mostaccessed/journal?quantity=&amp;format=rss&amp;version=">
        <title>Critical Care - Most accessed articles</title>
        <link>http://ccforum.com/</link>
        <description>The most accessed research articles published by Critical Care</description>
        <dc:date>2010-01-20T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <items>
            <rdf:Seq>
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ccforum.com/content/8/4/R204" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ccforum.com/content/14/1/R1" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ccforum.com/content/14/1/R5" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ccforum.com/content/9/6/R636" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ccforum.com/content/10/3/R73" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ccforum.com/content/13/6/R209" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ccforum.com/content/4/2/072" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ccforum.com/content/14/1/R6" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ccforum.com/content/14/1/R2" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ccforum.com/content/14/1/R4" />
                            </rdf:Seq>
        </items>
        <extra:info rdf:parseType="Literal">
            <html:div style="font:14px Verdana, Geneva, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" xmlns:html="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
                <html:span style="font-weight:bold">
                    This is an RSS newsfeed from BioMed Central
                </html:span>
                <html:br />
                <html:span style="font-size: 12px;">
                    It is intended to be used with an RSS reader. For more information about RSS newsfeeds from BioMed Central, visit
                    <html:br />
                    <html:a href="http://www.biomedcentral.com/info/about/rss/" style="color:#3333CC; font-size:12px;">
                        http://www.biomedcentral.com/info/about/rss/
                    </html:a>
                    <html:br />
                </html:span>
            </html:div>
        </extra:info>
        <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </channel>
        <item rdf:about="http://ccforum.com/content/8/4/R204">
        <title>Acute renal failure - definition, outcome measures, animal models, fluid therapy and information technology needs: the Second International Consensus Conference of the Acute Dialysis Quality Initiative (ADQI) Group</title>
        <description>IntroductionThere is no consensus definition of acute renal failure (ARF) in critically ill patients. More than 30 different definitions have been used in the literature, creating much confusion and making comparisons difficult. Similarly, strong debate exists on the validity and clinical relevance of animal models of ARF; on choices of fluid management and of end-points for trials of new interventions in this field; and on how information technology can be used to assist this process. Accordingly, we sought to review the available evidence, make recommendations and delineate key questions for future studies.
Methods:
We undertook a systematic review of the literature using Medline and PubMed searches. We determined a list of key questions and convened a 2-day consensus conference to develop summary statements via a series of alternating breakout and plenary sessions. In these sessions, we identified supporting evidence and generated recommendations and/or directions for future research.
Results:
We found sufficient consensus on 47 questions to allow the development of recommendations. Importantly, we were able to develop a consensus definition for ARF. In some cases it was also possible to issue useful consensus recommendations for future investigations. We present a summary of the findings. (Full versions of the six workgroups&apos; findings are available on the internet at http://www.ADQI.net)
Conclusion:
Despite limited data, broad areas of consensus exist for the physiological and clinical principles needed to guide the development of consensus recommendations for defining ARF, selection of animal models, methods of monitoring fluid therapy, choice of physiological and clinical end-points for trials, and the possible role of information technology.</description>
        <link>http://ccforum.com/content/8/4/R204</link>
                <dc:creator>Rinaldo Bellomo</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Claudio Ronco</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>John Kellum</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Ravindra Mehta</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Paul Palevski</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Critical Care 2004, 8:R204</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2004-05-24T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/cc2872</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Critical Care</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1364-8535</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>8</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>R204</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2004-05-24T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://ccforum.com/content/14/1/R1">
        <title>Ventilation with lower tidal volumes as compared to conventional tidal volumes for patients without acute lung injury - a preventive randomized controlled trial</title>
        <description>IntroductionRecent cohort studies have identified the use of large tidal volumes as a major risk factor for development of lung injury in mechanically ventilated patients without acute lung injury (ALI). We compared the effect of conventional with lower tidal volumes on pulmonary inflammation and development of lung injury in critically ill patients without ALI at the onset of mechanical ventilation.
Methods:
We performed a randomized controlled nonblinded preventive trial comparing mechanical ventilation with tidal volumes of 10 ml versus 6 ml per kilogram of predicted body weight in critically ill patients without ALI at the onset of mechanical ventilation. The primary end point was cytokine levels in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid and plasma during mechanical ventilation. The secondary end point was the development of lung injury, as determined by consensus criteria for ALI, duration of mechanical ventilation, and mortality.
Results:
One hundred fifty patients (74 conventional versus 76 lower tidal volume) were enrolled and analyzed. No differences were observed in lavage fluid cytokine levels at baseline between the randomization groups. Plasma interleukin-6 (IL-6) levels decreased significantly more strongly in the lower-tidal-volume group ((from 51 (20 to 182) ng/ml to 11 (5 to 20) ng/ml versus 50 (21 to 122) ng/ml to 21 (20 to 77) ng/ml; P = 0.01)). The trial was stopped prematurely for safety reasons because the development of lung injury was higher in the conventional tidal-volume group as compared with the lower tidal-volume group (13.5% versus 2.6%; P = 0.01). Univariate analysis showed statistical relations between baseline lung-injury score, randomization group, level of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP), the number of transfused blood products, the presence of a risk factor for ALI, and baseline IL-6 lavage fluid levels and the development of lung injury. Multivariate analysis revealed the randomization group and the level of PEEP as independent predictors of the development of lung injury.
Conclusions:
Mechanical ventilation with conventional tidal volumes is associated with sustained cytokine production, as measured in plasma. Our data suggest that mechanical ventilation with conventional tidal volumes contributes to the development of lung injury in patients without ALI at the onset of mechanical ventilation.Trial registrationISRCTN82533884</description>
        <link>http://ccforum.com/content/14/1/R1</link>
                <dc:creator>Rogier Determann</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Annick Royakkers</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Esther Wolthuis</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Alexander Vlaar</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Goda Choi</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Frederique Paulus</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Jorrit-Jan Hofstra</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Mart de Graaff</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Johanna Korevaar</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Marcus Schultz</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Critical Care 2010, 14:R1</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2010-01-07T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/cc8230</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Critical Care</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1364-8535</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>R1</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2010-01-07T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://ccforum.com/content/14/1/R5">
        <title>Effects of a fish oil containing lipid emulsion on plasma phospholipid fatty acids, inflammatory markers, and clinical outcomes in septic patients: a randomized, controlled clinical trial</title>
        <description>IntroductionThe effect of parenteral fish oil in septic patients is not widely studied. This study investigated the effects of parenteral fish oil on plasma phospholipid fatty acids, inflammatory mediators, and clinical outcomes.
Methods:
Twenty-five patients with systemic inflammatory response syndrome or sepsis, and predicted to need parenteral nutrition were randomized to receive either a 50:50 mixture of medium-chain fatty acids and soybean oil or a 50:40:10 mixture of medium-chain fatty acids, soybean oil and fish oil. Parenteral nutrition was administrated continuously for 5 days from admission. Cytokines and eicosanoids were measured in plasma and in lipopolysaccharide-stimulated whole blood culture supernatants. Fatty acids were measured in plasma phosphatidylcholine.
Results:
Fish oil increased eicosapentaenoic acid in plasma phosphatidylcholine (p &lt; 0.001). Plasma interleukin (IL)-6 concentration decreased significantly more, and IL-10 significantly less, in the fish oil group (both p &lt; 0.001). At day 6 the ratio PO2/FiO2 was significantly higher in the fish oil group (p = 0.047) and there were fewer patients with PO2/FiO2 &lt; 200 and &lt; 300 in the fish oil group (p = 0.001 and p = 0.015, respectively). Days of ventilation, length of ICU stay and mortality were not different between the two groups. The fish oil group tended to have a shorter length of hospital stay (22 +/- 7 vs. 55 +/- 16 days; p = 0.079) which became significant (28 +/- 9 vs. 82 +/- 19 days; p = 0.044) when only surviving patients were included.
Conclusions:
Inclusion of fish oil in parenteral nutrition provided to septic ICU patients increases plasma eicosapentaenoic acid, modifies inflammatory cytokine concentrations and improves gas exchange. These changes are associated with a tendency towards shorter length of hospital stay.Clinical Trials Registration Number: ISRCTN89432944</description>
        <link>http://ccforum.com/content/14/1/R5</link>
                <dc:creator>Vera Barbosa</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Elizabeth Miles</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Conceicao Calhau</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Estevao Lafuente</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Philip Calder</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Critical Care 2010, 14:R5</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2010-01-19T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/cc8844</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Critical Care</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1364-8535</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>R5</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2010-01-19T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>PDF</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://ccforum.com/content/9/6/R636">
        <title>Elevated troponin and myocardial infarction in the intensive care unit: a prospective study</title>
        <description>IntroductionElevated troponin levels indicate myocardial injury but may occur in critically ill patients without evidence of myocardial ischemia. An elevated troponin alone cannot establish a diagnosis of myocardial infarction (MI), yet the optimal methods for diagnosing MI in the intensive care unit (ICU) are not established. The study objective was to estimate the frequency of MI using troponin T measurements, 12-lead electrocardiograms (ECGs) and echocardiography, and to examine the association of elevated troponin and MI with ICU and hospital mortality and length of stay.MethodIn this 2-month single centre prospective cohort study, all consecutive patients admitted to our medical-surgical ICU were classified in duplicate by two investigators as having MI or no MI based on troponin, ECGs and echocardiograms obtained during the ICU stay. The diagnosis of MI was based on an adaptation of the joint European Society of Cardiology/American College of Cardiology definition: a typical rise or fall of an elevated troponin measurement, in addition to ischemic symptoms, ischemic ECG changes, a coronary artery intervention, or a new cardiac wall motion abnormality.
Results:
We screened 117 ICU admissions and enrolled 115 predominantly medical patients. Of these, 93 (80.9%) had at least one ECG and one troponin; 44 of these 93 (47.3%) had at least one elevated troponin and 24 (25.8%) had an MI. Patients with MI had significantly higher mortality in the ICU (37.5% versus 17.6%; P = 0.050) and hospital (50.0% versus 22.0%; P = 0.010) than those without MI. After adjusting for Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score and need for inotropes or vasopressors, MI was an independent predictor of hospital mortality (odds ratio 3.22, 95% confidence interval 1.04&#8211;9.96). The presence of an elevated troponin (among those patients in whom troponin was measured) was not independently predictive of ICU or hospital mortality.
Conclusion:
In this study, 47% of critically ill patients had an elevated troponin but only 26% of these met criteria for MI. An elevated troponin without ischemic ECG changes was not associated with adverse outcomes; however, MI in the ICU setting was an independent predictor of hospital mortality.</description>
        <link>http://ccforum.com/content/9/6/R636</link>
                <dc:creator>Wendy Lim</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Ismael Qushmaq</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Deborah Cook</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Mark Crowther</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Diane Heels-Ansdell</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>P. Devereaux</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Critical Care 2005, 9:R636</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2005-09-28T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/cc3816</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Critical Care</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1364-8535</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>9</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>R636</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2005-09-28T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://ccforum.com/content/10/3/R73">
        <title>RIFLE criteria for acute kidney injury are associated with hospital mortality in critically ill patients: a cohort analysis</title>
        <description>IntroductionThe lack of a standard definition for acute kidney injury has resulted in a large variation in the reported incidence and associated mortality. RIFLE, a newly developed international consensus classification for acute kidney injury, defines three grades of severity &#8211; risk (class R), injury (class I) and failure (class F) &#8211; but has not yet been evaluated in a clinical series.
Methods:
We performed a retrospective cohort study, in seven intensive care units in a single tertiary care academic center, on 5,383 patients admitted during a one year period (1 July 2000&#8211;30 June 2001).
Results:
Acute kidney injury occurred in 67% of intensive care unit admissions, with maximum RIFLE class R, class I and class F in 12%, 27% and 28%, respectively. Of the 1,510 patients (28%) that reached a level of risk, 840 (56%) progressed. Patients with maximum RIFLE class R, class I and class F had hospital mortality rates of 8.8%, 11.4% and 26.3%, respectively, compared with 5.5% for patients without acute kidney injury. Additionally, acute kidney injury (hazard ratio, 1.7; 95% confidence interval, 1.28&#8211;2.13; P &lt; 0.001) and maximum RIFLE class I (hazard ratio, 1.4; 95% confidence interval, 1.02&#8211;1.88; P = 0.037) and class F (hazard ratio, 2.7; 95% confidence interval, 2.03&#8211;3.55; P &lt; 0.001) were associated with hospital mortality after adjusting for multiple covariates.
Conclusion:
In this general intensive care unit population, acute kidney &apos;risk, injury, failure&apos;, as defined by the newly developed RIFLE classification, is associated with increased hospital mortality and resource use. Patients with RIFLE class R are indeed at high risk of progression to class I or class F. Patients with RIFLE class I or class F incur a significantly increased length of stay and an increased risk of inhospital mortality compared with those who do not progress past class R or those who never develop acute kidney injury, even after adjusting for baseline severity of illness, case mix, race, gender and age.</description>
        <link>http://ccforum.com/content/10/3/R73</link>
                <dc:creator>Eric Hoste</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Giles Clermont</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Alexander Kersten</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Ramesh Venkataraman</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Derek Angus</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Dirk De Bacquer</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>John Kellum</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Critical Care 2006, 10:R73</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2006-05-12T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/cc4915</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Critical Care</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1364-8535</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>10</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>R73</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2006-05-12T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://ccforum.com/content/13/6/R209">
        <title>Intensivists&apos; base specialty of training is associated with variations in mortality and practice patterns</title>
        <description>IntroductionCurrent evidence regarding whether the staffing of intensive care units (ICUs) with a trained Intensivist benefits patient outcomes is discordant. We sought to determine whether, among certified Intensivists, base specialty of training could contribute to variation in practice patterns and patient outcomes in ICUs.
Methods:
The records of all patients who were admitted to one of three closed multi-system ICUs within tertiary care centers in the Calgary Health Region, Alberta, Canada, during a five year period were retrospectively reviewed. Outcomes for patients admitted by Intensivists with base training in General Internal Medicine, Pulmonary Medicine, or other eligible base specialties (Anesthesia, General Surgery, and Emergency Medicine combined) were compared.
Results:
ICU mortality in the entire cohort (n = 9,808) was 17.2% and in-hospital mortality was 32.0%. After controlling for potential confounders, ICU mortality (odds ratio (OR): 0.69; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.52 to 0.94) was significantly lower for patients admitted by Intensivists with Pulmonary Medicine as a base specialty of training, but not ICU length of stay (LOS) (coefficient: 0.11; -0.20 to 0.42) or hospital mortality (OR: 0.88; 0.68 to 1.13). There was no difference in ICU or hospital mortality or length of stay between the three base specialty groups for patients who were admitted and managed by a single Intensivist for their entire ICU admission (n = 4,612). However, we identified significant variation in practice patterns between the three specialty groups for the number of invasive procedures performed and decisions to limit life-sustaining therapies.
Conclusions:
Intensivists&apos; base specialty of training is associated with practice pattern variations. This may contribute to differences in processes and outcomes of patient care.</description>
        <link>http://ccforum.com/content/13/6/R209</link>
                <dc:creator>Emma Billington</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>David Zygun</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>H Tom Stelfox</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Adam Peets</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Critical Care 2009, 13:R209</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-12-29T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/cc8227</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Critical Care</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1364-8535</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>13</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>R209</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-12-29T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://ccforum.com/content/4/2/072">
        <title>Weaning from mechanical ventilation</title>
        <description>Practice guidelines on weaning should be based on the results of			 several well-designed randomized studies performed over the last decade. One of			 those studies demonstrated that immediate extubation after successful trials of			 spontaneous breathing expedites weaning and reduces the duration of mechanical			 ventilation as compared with a more gradual discontinuation of ventilatory			 support. Two other studies showed that the ability to breathe spontaneously can			 be adequately tested by performing a trial with either T-tube or pressure			 support of 7 cmH2O lasting either 30 or 120 min. In patients with			 unsuccessful weaning trials, a gradual withdrawal for mechanical ventilation			 can be attempted while factors responsible for the ventilatory dependence are			 corrected. Two randomized studies found that, in difficult-to-wean patients,			 synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation (SIMV) is the most effective			 method of weaning.</description>
        <link>http://ccforum.com/content/4/2/072</link>
                <dc:creator>Inmaculada Alía</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Andrés Esteban</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Critical Care 2000, 4:72</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2000-02-18T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/cc660</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Critical Care</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1364-8535</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>4</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>72</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2000-02-18T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://ccforum.com/content/14/1/R6">
        <title>Quality of life in the five years after intensive care: a cohort study</title>
        <description>IntroductionData on quality of life beyond 2 years after intensive care discharge are limited and we aimed to explore this area further. Our objective was to quantify quality of life and health utilities in the 5 years after intensive care discharge.
Methods:
A prospective longitudinal cohort study in a University Hospital in the UK. Quality of life was assessed from the period before ICU admission until 5 years and quality adjusted life years calculated.
Results:
300 level 3 intensive care patients of median age 60.5 years and median length of stay 6.7 days, were recruited. Physical quality of life fell to 3 months (P = 0.003), rose back to pre-morbid levels at 12 months then fell again from 2.5 to 5 years after intensive care (P = 0.002). Mean physical scores were below the population norm at all time points but the mean mental scores after 6 months were similar to those population norms. The utility value measured using the EuroQOL-5D quality of life assessment tool  (EQ-5D) at 5 years was 0.677. During the five years after intensive care unit, the cumulative quality adjusted life years were significantly lower than that expected for the general population (P &lt; 0.001).
Conclusions:
Intensive care unit admission is associated with a high mortality, a poor physical quality of life and a low quality adjusted life years gained compared to the general population for 5 years after discharge. In this group, critical illness associated with ICU admission should be treated as a life time diagnosis with associated excess mortality, morbidity and the requirement for ongoing health care support.</description>
        <link>http://ccforum.com/content/14/1/R6</link>
                <dc:creator>Brian Cuthbertson</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Sian Roughton</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>David Jenkinson</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Graeme MacLennan</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Luke Vale</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Critical Care 2010, 14:R6</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2010-01-20T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/cc8848</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Critical Care</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1364-8535</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>R6</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2010-01-20T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>PDF</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://ccforum.com/content/14/1/R2">
        <title>Quality of life in patients aged 80 or over after ICU discharge

</title>
        <description>IntroductionOur objective was to describe self-sufficiency and quality of life 1 year after intensive care unit (ICU) discharge of patients aged 80 years or over.
Methods:
We performed a prospective observational study in a medical-surgical ICU in a tertiary non-university hospital. We included patients aged 80 or over at ICU admission in 2005 or 2006 and we recorded age, admission diagnosis, intensity of care, and severity of acute and chronic illnesses, as well as ICU, hospital, and 1-year mortality rates. Self-sufficiency (Katz Index of Activities of Daily Living) was assessed at ICU admission and 1 year after ICU discharge. Quality of life (WHO-QOL OLD and WHO-QOL BREF) was assessed 1 year after ICU discharge.
Results:
Of the 115 consecutive patients aged 80 or over (18.2% of admitted patients), 106 were included. Mean age was 84 +/- 3 years (range, 80 - 92). Mortality was 40/106 (37%) at ICU discharge, 48/106 (45.2%) at hospital discharge, and 73/106 (68.9%) 1 year after ICU discharge. In the 23 patients evaluated after 1 year, self-sufficiency was unchanged compared to the pre-admission status. Quality of life evaluations after 1 year showed that physical health, sensory abilities, self-sufficiency, and social participation had slightly worse ratings than the other domains, whereas social relationships, environment, and fear of death and dying had the best ratings. Compared to an age- and sex-matched sample of the general population, our cohort had better ratings for psychological health, social relationships, and environment, less fear of death and dying, better expectations about past, present, and future activities and better intimacy (friendship and love).
Conclusions:
Among patients aged 80 or over who were selected to ICU admission, 80% were self-sufficient for activities of daily living One year after ICU discharge, 31% were alive, with no change in self-sufficiency and with similar quality of life to that of the general population matched on age and sex. However, these results must be interpreted cautiously due to the small sample of survivors.</description>
        <link>http://ccforum.com/content/14/1/R2</link>
                <dc:creator>Alexis Tabah</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Francois Philippart</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Jean-Francois Timsit</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Vincent Willems</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Adrien Francais</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Alain Leplege</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Jean Carlet</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Cedric Bruel</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Benoit Misset</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Maite Garrouste-Orgeas</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Critical Care 2010, 14:R2</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2010-01-08T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/cc8231</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Critical Care</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1364-8535</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>R2</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2010-01-08T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>PDF</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://ccforum.com/content/14/1/R4">
        <title>Protective effect of resin adsorption on septic plasma-induced tubular injury</title>
        <description>IntroductionA pro-apoptotic effect of circulating mediators on renal tubular epithelial cells has been involved in the pathogenesis of sepsis-associated acute kidney injury (AKI). Adsorption techniques have been showed to efficiently remove inflammatory cytokines from plasma. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficiency of the hydrophobic resin Amberchrom CG161M to adsorb from septic plasma soluble mediators involved in tubular injury.
Methods:
We enrolled in the study 10 critically ill patients with sepsis-associated AKI and we evaluated the effects of their plasma on granulocyte adhesion, apoptosis and functional alterations of cultured human kidney tubular epithelial cells. We established an in vitro model of plasma adsorption and we studied the protective effect of unselective removal of soluble mediators by the Amberchrom CG161M resin on septic plasma-induced tubular cell injury.
Results:
Plasma from septic patients induced granulocyte adhesion, apoptosis and altered polarity in tubular cells. Plasma adsorption significantly decreased these effects and abated the concentrations of several soluble mediators. The inhibition of granulocyte adhesion to tubular cells was associated with the down-regulation of ICAM-1 and CD40. Resin adsorption inhibited tubular cell apoptosis induced by septic plasma by down-regulating the activation of caspase-3, 8, 9 and of Fas/death receptor-mediated signalling pathways. The alteration of cell polarity, morphogenesis, protein reabsorption and the down-regulation of the tight junction molecule ZO-1, of the sodium transporter NHE3, of the glucose transporter GLUT-2 and of the endocytic receptor megalin all induced by septic plasma were significantly reduced by resin adsorption.
Conclusions:
Septic plasma induced a direct injury of tubular cells by favouring granulocyte adhesion, by inducing cell apoptosis and by altering cell polarity and function. All these biological effects are related to the presence of circulating inflammatory mediators that can be efficiently removed by resin adsorption with a consequent limitation of tubular cell injury.</description>
        <link>http://ccforum.com/content/14/1/R4</link>
                <dc:creator>Vincenzo Cantaluppi</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Viktoria Weber</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Carola Lauritano</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Federico Figliolini</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Silvia Beltramo</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Luigi Biancone</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Massimo De Cal</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Dinna Cruz</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Claudio Ronco</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Giuseppe Segoloni</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Ciro Tetta</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Giovanni Camussi</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Critical Care 2010, 14:R4</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2010-01-11T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/cc8835</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Critical Care</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1364-8535</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>R4</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2010-01-11T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>PDF</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <cc:License rdf:about="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/">
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Reproduction" />
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Distribution" />
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#DerivativeWorks" />
    </cc:License>
</rdf:RDF>
