http://ccforum.com/content/12/3/216/comments The latest comments on the article 'Pro-Con debate: 24/7 in-house intensivist coverage should be implemented' 2008-07-03T00:00:00Z This is an RSS newsfeed from BioMed Central It is intended to be used with an RSS reader. For more information about RSS newsfeeds from BioMed Central, visit http://www.biomedcentral.com/info/about/rss/ http://ccforum.com/content/12/3/216/comments#305584 <p>I read with interest the well-balanced article by Arabi on the debateful topic 'Should 24/7 in-house intensivist coverage be implemented?' The article focuses on the impact 24/7 intensivist cover would have on patient outcomes. To add to this article it is also important to recognise the impact this has on junior doctor training. Having worked in a large university intensive care unit which had 24/7 resident senior intensivist cover, I experienced more opportunities to develop my procedural skills and handle clinical cases. This was always under supervision, initially the senior intensivist playing a major role in the management but this gradually decreased to give me more autonomy. In addition, as the senior intensivist was resident 24/7, training continued throughout the night, whether in the form of didactical teaching, informal discussions, procedural demonstrations and overseeing cases I may be managaing. Overall, I believe that 24/7 intensive cover not only is beneficial for patients, but has a positive impact on training of junior doctors.</p> Nishith Patel 2008-07-03T00:00:00Z